Of Time and the River

“No man knew whom to trust, and gloomy suspicions even of his friends settled upon every man’s heart.”  So wrote Jeremiah Clemens of northern Alabama during its bitter occupation 150 years ago, as was noted in today’s New York Times Civil War blog.  As it happens, the events described in the Times piece took place not so far from where I live. Most days, while walking the dogs, I pass by a commemorative sign recounting some of the skirmishes near the Tennessee border. Of particular interest to me this afternoon, however, was the following sentence: “Through 1862, guerrilla fighters in Paint Rock, Ala. under Lemuel Mead continually harassed Union troops from the Third Ohio under Col. John Beatty.”

It’s not so much the people as the place, Paint Rock, that intrigues me.  As readers of Ramble–the blog of my friend and colleague, David Haskell, of The Forest Unseen fame–will know, the Paint Rock River watershed is slated to be conserved as a wildlife refuge.  As David wrote last May,

In the case of the Paint Rock, one of the Eastern U.S.’s crown jewels (if you’ll excuse the royalist metaphor in this republic) of biodiversity would be protected, with the additional benefit of providing public access (including hunting) to large areas of unfragmented forest, access that is becoming harder and harder to secure as the last remaining “open” lands get closed off by development and other pressures. I am delighted that this project has received such high priority — it would be a major win for the people of Tennessee and Alabama (and for the world‘s biodiversity — few places can rival the Paint Rock River).

Since then, the project has become the topic of controversy.  The federal proposal states, “Lands only become part of the National Wildlife Refuge System when they are purchased from willing sellers or placed under agreements with willing participants.”  Nonetheless, a number of residents in the area are convinced there are plans to seize their property.  As one blogger writes,”The proposal has all property to the right of hwy 16 included in the refuge, which means approximately 200-250 people will be displaced, homes, property. … We are a strong willed people and we intend to stand and fight.”  A local radio station has even reported that the refuge will be used by the Obama administration to train Homeland security forces.  Still, it’s not as though eminent domain has not been an issue in the recent past: you have only to speak to people in the area who remember the construction of Tim’s Ford Lake in the 1960s.

Local politicians have not done much to quell the outrage anxiety.  According to the Winchester Herald Chronicle, at a town meeting last week, state senator Janice Bowling and state representative David Alexander promised to fight if the proposal was against the will of the people, while Congressman Scott DesJarlais is quoted as having said, “Once they piece some of this together from willing sellers, when does eminent domain come into play? If you want me to stand up here and tell you to just trust the government, I wouldn’t do that.”  Not knowing who to trust? Standing and fighting? I’ve known rivers, writes Langston Hughes. I’ve known rivers ancient as the world and older than the flow of human blood in human veins. By the Paint Rock River, time does not seem to have flowed for a century and a half.


About Uncomely and Broken

I am a classicist in Sewanee, Tennessee.
This entry was posted in Dogs, Poetry, Sewanee, Tennessee, Time, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Of Time and the River

  1. 411bee says:

    Two things, well, actually three things happen when people start talking about creating public land. 1 – Residents assume that the right of eminent domain will be used; 2 – they are certain that the plan will bring undesirable elements close to their homes; and 3 – politicians take advantage of any feelings of uncertainty. Time and again the creation of public space leads to economic gains, not losses. Time and again eminent domain is not a part of the creation. I think a reading of eminent domain history will reveal two (ab)uses – that by utilities (TVA), and that in urban areas likely an equal result of personal gain (turning land to developers) and eradication of urban blight.
    From The Chattanooga Times Free Press: “Fish and Wildlife hopes to have a draft plan for the Paint Rock River National Wildlife Refuge ready for public review in April and have authorization for the refuge by fall. After that, it could take years to purchase land and acquire easements to create the refuge.”

    And, from the proposal’s FAQ, available online at http://www.fws.gov/southeast/paintrockriver/QandA.html
    “What if my land is within the conservation partnership area and I do not want to sell?
    You maintain every right to your land, including the right to sell your land to whomever you choose. It is the policy of the Service to purchase lands only from willing sellers. Having land within the conservation partnership area does not require you to sell your property to the Service. Please see our Landowner Options fact sheet for more information.”
    Scott DesJarlais has some balls talking about trust, doesn’t he? He trusts the government to send him a paycheck, does he not? For once could he work on something positive for the state?

  2. Pingback: Post-scripts to Paint Rock River Post | uncomelyandbroken

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s